Why Higher Education Should Be Free
The average college graduate comes out of college with at least $60,000 in debt and if they went to an Ivy League should that shots up to up ward of $100,000 all this debt before they even get their first real job. This is the burden that students have to worry about and then they only have six months to find a job that can cover they loan payments, which can be as much as a couple thousand dollars a month. Most working people can’t afford that and have their own place, bills, and children. That is why college students end up moving back home after graduation.
We are given the right to an education when we are younger, we go to pubic school and learn basic stuff but if we want to get ahead in the job market we have to get a degree but most people can’t afford it and ones that do have one can’t find a job. It a Catch 22 in world but what if high school graduates had access to free higher education, would this improve the job market and the skills that people can possess. It’s not that all schools should be free but community colleges and maybe even state colleges should be free for students of that state. This way they can still get money from out of state students to help offset the cost.
There are many places around the world that give students access to a free college education like Finland, Austria, Norway, Germany, and Sweden but there are some ways that you can go to free at some places in the United States. This is usually if the student gets a scholarship but there are free ones. College of the Ozarks relies on donations to let their 1400 students attend for free. There are also others but they are really small schools and it is nearly impossible to get in because of the size.
Higher education does need some reform that has to be a way that we can educate all students from every aspect of life. We deserve to learn life skills in college for free since we don’t learn it in high school. Free college education will ensure that everyone gets to get an education and it will help the entire world in the long run because then we would have smarter people to run things.
The USA doesn’t have free education for students, at least at the higher levels. Much has been made about increasing levels of debt. Some people have even called for the introduction of free education. This would be a major mistake. It would decrease personal freedoms for much of the general population, reduce quality, and send the wrong message to students. This essay will explain why.
Firstly, someone has to pay for education. It’s physically impossible to deliver quality education while charging students nothing. Someone has to pay for it. If it isn’t students taking care of their responsibilities, it’s taxpayers who already pay for the substantial grants and scholarships awarded to students every year. It’s wrong to place this burden on the general population for a decision entirely resting on the individual’s shoulders.
Making education free would mean the money has to be found from elsewhere. The only options available to the government would be to raise taxes or cut services elsewhere. It’s no fairer to cut other vital services than it is to make students pay for education. It doesn’t solve the problem, it only shifts the problem onto another part of the population.
Increasing taxes to pay for education reduces personal freedoms. Economic freedom directly correlates with personal freedoms. By cutting disposable income through the raising of taxes, it reduces the options available for families across the country. Arguably, it’s selfish to do this because a minority group decides to go into higher education.
Some would argue making education free would open up colleges and universities to a greater number of students. This isn’t the case. Although education isn’t free now, this in no way means people are prohibited from entering higher education. Grants awarding achievement already exist for the best students. Furthermore, the vast majority of students can already receive student loans to pay for tuition and maintenance. There are no barriers to students entering higher education even without a free tuition system.
With the current student loan system, lenders are far more forgiving and the repayments are much lower than a conventional loan. The system already allows students to climb up the career ladder before they start to pay back significant amounts.
Cutting fees would also make it more difficult to continue to improve the standard of education within schools and colleges. If these institutions can’t make a profit from charging their students, they can only make enough to cover their maintenance costs. They can’t invest in themselves and boost standards. This would only lead to the continuing decline of American higher education facilities and make the country less attractive for international students.
Overall, it’s important to make students understand they have responsibilities and the onus rests on them to take care of these responsibilities. It’s wrong to place the burdens of others onto the general population. Cutting fees would bring benefits to students who don’t have to pay for their own education, but it would only lead to the general decline of the facilities they study at.